Search for: "S Saffle"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
In Johnson, the Supreme Court held that the ACCA’s residual clause was unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 10:12 pm
" Saffle, supra, at 488. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 8:54 pm
” Saffle v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 8:20 pm
” Saffle v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 11:54 pm
Saffle, 148 F.3d 1180, 1181 (10th Cir.1998) (citing Boling v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 8:23 am
Roberson, 486 U.S. 675 (1988)); Saffle v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
Teague argued that “the Sixth Amendment’s fair cross section requirement applies to the petit jury. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 3:30 pm
Saffle v. [read post]
